Carnegie Mellon Unveils New Classroom Study Tracing Environmental and Social Footprint of Pittsburgh Region from 1900 to 2050
May 13, 2010
Contact: Chriss Swaney
Carnegie Mellon University
412.268.5776
Contact: Shilo Raube
Carnegie Mellon University
412.268.6094
PITTSBURGH—Carnegie Mellon University researchers and students have unveiled a new study that found Allegheny County has seen an almost 20 percent decrease in total energy consumption and a 33 percent decrease in total carbon dioxide emissions since 1970, solely due to the collapse of the iron and steel industry in the area.
The study was compiled by a team of 24 Carnegie Mellon students from the
departments of Engineering and Public Policy (EPP) and Social and Decision
Sciences (SDS) under the supervision of professors H. Scott Matthews and Paul
Fischbeck. They developed an estimate of the county's energy consumption and
carbon dioxide emissions for every decade from 1900 to 2000.
"We determined the
environmental impact for four major energy use sectors for Allegheny County,
including residential, commercial, industrial and transportation," said
Matthews, an associate professor of civil and environmental engineering and
EPP. "We found that per capita energy consumption in the county has risen over
the century, but has remained roughly constant since 1970. We also found that
from 1900 to 2000, per capita carbon dioxide emissions in Allegheny County have
varied very little with 2000 values about equal to 1900."
When
compared to other regions of the country, the county is one of a few that has
already achieved significant reductions in carbon emissions over 50 years, but
these reductions came at tremendous cost - the loss of hundreds of thousands
jobs and an entire industry. During this time, residential, commercial and
transportation emissions have increased, but much less than the huge industrial
decrease. As other regions start to plan their reduction strategies, lessons
learned from Pittsburgh serve as a strong reminder of the social costs of
serious reduction.
Carnegie Mellon researchers also calculated what the county's carbon
footprint would be in the future by modeling an increase in immigration to
Pittsburgh, more "green power" and residential energy efficiency investments
from Pennsylvania's Act 129 program (designed to reduce electricity usage by 1
percent in 2011).
"We found that it is very difficult to move the needle of Allegheny
County's carbon emissions more than a few percentage points in either
direction," said Fischbeck, a professor in SDS and EPP. "Whether our population
increases about 10 percent by 2050, or we benefit from an increase to 20
percent green power, or we get $10 million in investments from Act 129, the
estimated carbon emissions will not change very much for the county."
As part of the study, the students surveyed 280 county residents who
were under 21 or over 60 years of age. The survey asked them to estimate the
1960 and 2060 values for various environmental and social indicators for the
county, such as population, number of cars and carbon emissions. While the two
groups generally estimated correct values, some interesting discrepancies were
found.
"One intriguing finding from our survey is that folks younger than 21
think that carbon dioxide emissions have increased over the last 50 years, and
will continue to increase in the future, while participants older than 60
(correctly) estimated that emissions have been decreasing, and will continue to
decrease," Matthews said. "We think the survey yields some interesting
information for the county's policy makers because it represents an astute
older population who know how the county has changed and predict a low-carbon,
stable future, while the younger generation predicts much higher growth for the
county, and in turn more emissions."